- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 05:33:56 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Hey, Given as far as I know you've been at least somewhat involved with every spec that's used wpt as part of its implementation report, let me throw a few questions at you: * How's the lack of versioning been dealt with? (e.g., between HTML5 and tests for features added since HTML5 was forked) * How's the W3C/WHATWG divergence been dealt with? (For specs for which that applies!) Far as I can tell, neither of them really have been dealt with. If I'm not misreading the few IRs I opened up, they've all assumed that all tests within the respective directories in wpt apply to the spec leaving CR. Furthermore, when it comes to links to the testsuite, they seem to all just link to that directory in the master branch of wpt, which will become increasingly less useful at testing a stable snapshot as time progresses! There's also the interesting case of a edit to a REC that ends up being first published as a CR, where one would presumably want to add/modify tests relative to the testsuite for the REC while excluding tests for more recent revisions of the spec to exit CR then. As an aside: there's been some discussion in the CSS WG about testsuites recently (uh, my doing, "whoops") which you might have some interest in, some of which deals with issues like testsuites for different versions of a spec. /Geoffrey
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 04:34:29 UTC