Re: Environment settings objects vs global objects

If the only reason for this separation was the theoretical possibility of a
different scripting language on the web, I'm all for merging them. The
cross-origin object spec uses a bunch of ES-specific MOP stuff anyway.

bholley

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There's quite a few of concepts that seem to map 1:1 to globals. I'm
> wondering if I should try to get rid of environment settings objects
> in favor of adding its internal slots to global objects. I could also
> add them to Realms I suppose, if that was preferred. Not sure what the
> current thinking of Realms vs globals is. I guess Realms might make
> more sense if we're getting that Realm object.
>
> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/167 has some extra words.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>