- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:12:48 -0400
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- CC: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, "Richard S. Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown.idi@gmail.com>, Member Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5550B8E0.8000700@w3.org>
Yes. The invite went to lisa.seeman@zoho.com. You might want to check spam folder settings etc. I can forward the invite, but it would be better to sort out why you didn't receive it so you can receive updates in the future. Michael On 09/05/2015 11:50 PM, lisa.seeman wrote: > > Hi Michael > Was I also meant to get an email directly from webex? > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com> > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Fri, 08 May 2015 21:20:13 +0300 *Michael > Cooper<cooper@w3.org>* wrote ---- > > As you know, the W3C Zakim teleconference bridge will soon be > decommissioned. As a supposedly interim solution, W3C will use > WebEx for teleconferences. I am about to schedule WebEx > reservations for the groups in my area of responsibility. For each > reservation, I will have the system send the chair / facilitator > of that call information about the reservation, for you to include > in your agenda. This message is to let you know to look out for > those messages and explain why you'll be seeing them. > > A number of notes about this: > > * Please keep the mail you receive from WebEx. I do not know of > a lookup service to find information about a given call if you > forget it. As the scheduler of these calls I can look it up if > needed, but it would involve a loop without guaranteed fast > response. It will be best for you to save the email in some > place you know to look. > * I am scheduling calls that I can remember. I don't attend all > calls so may forget about some I need to schedule. Please ping > me if you don't get a WebEx reservation within an hour of this > message for a call you need to keep running. > * I am not at the moment scheduling WebEx reservations for joint > task forces, because I don't want to cross wires with the > staff contact of the other group. If you would like me to be > the one to set up the reservation for a joint task force, let > me know. I will also try to check with the staff contacts of > joint task forces to work it out with them directly, but it's > best if facilitators work directly with whichever staff > contact they want managing the call. This matters because only > the person who originally scheduled the call can make changes > to it, so you should work with whichever staff contact is > closer to that particular group (sometimes me, sometimes not). > * WebEx does not allow us to choose the meeting code, so we > can't get mnemonic codes. Each meeting will have a different 9 > digit code, but recurring meetings will have the same code > week to week. So while each different meeting will have a > different code, the connection information for a given meeting > is the same week to week and you can copy forwards from your > agenda messages. Because we will not have mnemonic codes and > there will be different codes for each of the several W3C > meetings some people attend each week, it will be important to > provide the full connection information in each week's agenda. > Note there is also a URI to join the meeting which some people > will be able to use without needing the code, you should > include this in your agenda also. > * WebEx uses a meeting "password" in addition to the code. The > password is something I can choose and will try to make > obvious choices for our meetings, and it will be in the > automated mail you receive. Let me know if you prefer a > different password. > * I strongly recommend you test the WebEx system with your group > within the next couple weeks, if you have not already done so. > There will be some startup pains as people figure out what > connection method works for them, get their devices working > with the WebEx tools, get out of the habit of using Zakim, > etc. Scheduling time in an upcoming agenda where you can test > the WebEx system, while also having the Zakim bridge open so > people can fall back to it and say "help" will help smooth the > transition. > * My understanding is Zakim will be decommissioned at the end of > June. You can switch to WebEx at any time before then if you > like, once you have tested it out with the group. If you do > not test it out before the end of June, you will be forced to > switch anyways and should expect some bumps at that time. > * WebEx has features beyond audio teleconferencing, such as > screen sharing, whiteboard, chat, video, closed captioning, > file transfer, etc. In my initial experiments with WebEx I > have found that these features can be very distracting if not > well managed, and as far as I can tell it's not possible to do > things like only allow one person to share their screen - > anybody else can just take over at any time which really > interrupts a presentation. So for the moment I am setting up > meetings with most of these features turned off. If you would > like your meeting to support one of these features, let me > know and I can turn it on. > * WebEx defines a "host" that has some extra call management > abilities. There can only be one host at a time, which I > believe is either the first person to join the meeting, or > somebody with a code that allows them to take over the host > role. Initially I plan to be the "host" while we work out > kinks, but will give chairs / facilitators the host code so > you can manage your call. *Please do not share the host code > for your meeting with participants, as chaos could ensue.* > * Although the Zakim teleconference bridge will disappear, the > zakim IRC bot will not. It will not longer be able to identify > callers, but its agenda and queue management features will > still work. The current expectation is that groups will > continue to use the usual IRC meeting minutes tools etc. > * General information about WebEx is available from > https://mit.webex.com/. This is also where to go to to join a > meeting if choosing to do it via the web client or request a > dialout. > * It is possible to dial into WebEx using a local or nearby > number in many areas. These numbers are listed at > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/conferencing/index.html. > You can point people to this page in your agendas if you want, > or you can include specific local numbers for your > participants if you think it would be helpful. > * Some suggestions for using WebEx for W3C calls are available > at https://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/WebExBestPractices. This > resource may evolve. Let me know if you think of something > that should be added to it. > * Keeping track of attendees in the meeting will be a challenge. > Users of the web client will be able to see a participants > list, but some of the participants may be just a phone number > or something, and we don't have a way to tell the system which > connection belongs to whom. You will need to use the "present: > " or "present+ " commands in IRC to get participants listed. > * Muting noisy lines will be a challenge. The web client does > indicate who is speaking / making noise. However, only the > "host" can force mute someone if that person doesn't mute > themselves. As far as I know, there isn't a feature for people > to unmute themselves with the phone keypad, so keep in mind > that if you mute someone they may be unable to speak up unless > they are in the web client. > * The WebEx web client isn't fully accessible to all users, so > some people may not be able to use WebEx that way. There are > smartphone apps for the major phone systems that are > reportedly more accessible. It's also possible to dial in > using the plain old telephone network. Some people have been > exploring the accessibility gotchas and workarounds, and > hopefully there will be some documentation about that you can > share with your groups. > > Good luck! I expect there will be startup challenges so let me > know when you need help. > > Michael > > >
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 14:12:50 UTC