[wbs] response to 'TR Design Survey'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'TR Design Survey'
(public) for Ted Guild.

> 
> ---------------------------------
> Group
> ----
> 
> On behalf of which W3C Working Group are you answering this survey?
> 
> 
> 
 
Automotive

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Sample(s)
> ----
> Paste in URLs to a representative sample (1-3 links) of your specs. If
> styling differs substantially between /TR and your editor's drafts,
> please link to both versions. 
> 
> 
 
http://www.w3.org/TR/vehicle-information-api/
http://www.w3.org/TR/vehicle-data/

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Specification Processor(s)
> ----
> What spec pre-processor(s) does your WG use?
> 
> 
 
Respec

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Group style sheet(s)
> ----
> Paste in URLs to any WG-specific style sheets you use.
> 
> 
 
NA

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Like
> ----
> What do you like about your current styles?
> 
> 
 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Dislike
> ----
> What do you dislike about your current styles?
> 
> 
 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Complex style
> ----
> Paste in URLs to any parts of your spec that are stylistically complex or
> tricky, and we should therefore be careful not to screw up.
> 
> 
 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Table style
> ----
> The new styles will include rules for rendering data tables. These will
> be opt-in by class name, and rely heavily on good markup (use of THEAD,
> TBODY, COLGROUP, scope attributes, etc.). See Simple Example, Less Simple
> Example, and Extra-Complex Example. Paste in URLs to a sampling of any
> data tables you are using so that we can try to accommodate those in the
> styling, if practical. 
> 
> 
 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> CSS WG Style
> ----
> The CSSWG has made a number of minor improvements to the existing spec
> styles, which we might just adopt wholesale. Please comment on what you
> like/dislike about these styles, as demonstrated in the CSS3 Text
> specification.
> 
> 
 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Anything else?
> ----
> 
>     Is there anything else we should consider?
> 
> 
> 
 
I discussed with the other Team Contact and WG Chair and we are fine to
defer to CSSWG and welcome their expertise in improving readability. 

> 
> These answers were last modified on 29 July 2015 at 16:11:29 U.T.C.
> by Ted Guild
> 
Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/tr-design-survey-2015/ until 2015-09-01.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:12:09 UTC