On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: >> Looks like you're correct, that bit should be removed. If you update >> the test to match the new algorithm (assuming I wrote a test for it, >> I'm pretty sure I did) and it doesn't change which browsers pass, then >> we could be extra super sure. :) > > It seems there's already quite some divergence between your reference > implementation and the specification :-/ Though when I removed the > line about throwing for detached ranges, nothing broke... I have updated the specification meanwhile, still unsure about what would have to be changed to the test: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/4c0fb2a7c2d80d34e931f1ffd9fe85b18ab5a49c -- https://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Sunday, 12 July 2015 07:19:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:35:20 UTC