It seems I hadn't sorry, just sent the request to join. Happy to see the snapshot refreshed as well. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk < mvanouwerkerk@google.com> wrote: > +Miguel > > Hi Arthur, Miguel is my manager (Google). Miguel: did you join the WebApps > WG? > > The spec did change significantly, some through renaming, some through > clarification of terminology and concepts. We are currently working on > encryption of the data payload, and better integration with the IETF Web > Push Protocol, which we expect will continue to evolve through 2015. That > may require some changes or additions to the Push API spec. > > Still with that caveat, I think we can move forward with a new WD just to > refresh the snapshot. > > /m > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Push API Editors, >> >> It appears the differences between the latest Push API ED [ED] and the >> last Technical Report [TR] are substantive enough to warrant a new WD >> publication. WDYT? If you agree, I'll start a PSA and prepare the WD for >> publication on April 30. Please let me know. >> >> Also, I see some commits from "Miguel Garcia" (f.ex. [MG]). Who is >> Miguel's employer? Miguel is not a member of WebApps [Partic]. >> >> -Thanks, Art >> >> [ED] http://w3c.github.io/push-api/ >> [TR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-push-api-20141007/ >> [MG] >> https://github.com/w3c/push-api/commits/gh-pages?author=miguelgarciaarribas >> [Partic] https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=42538 >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 13:11:43 UTC