- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0700
- To: "Santiago M. Mola" <santi@mola.io>
- CC: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On 10/29/14 3:40 PM, Santiago M. Mola wrote: > > My rationale is that: > > a) Uppercase percent-encoding is already the standard form (i.e. as > defined by the percent-encoding process). > b) Both forms are equivalent. > c) Normalizing it at parsing time is cheap. > > Probably the main point against including this in the standard is that > browsers don't do it. > > If this doesn't make it into the standard, I'll have to make my mind: > make it optional (.convertPercentEncodingToUppercase) or the default > (providing an option .pedanticCompliance) ;-) Agreed. The spec says: uppercase: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#percent-encode The expected test results and pretty much all user agents (other than galimatias) lower case: http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/urltest-results/80d72b7e67 I think the spec should change here. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2014 22:58:15 UTC