I think the content at http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html would represent a nice addition to https://url.spec.whatwg.org/, but can't really replace the parsing steps we already have. It would be great to have a regex/state-machine like visual representation of the url bits (very useful when looking for things that are not allowed), but the steps to implement the parsing algorithm are also necessary if you're writing a new url-parser or simply debugging your own. So it would be really good if we could have the same simplified visual style in the whatwg spec, and keep the parsing steps as a detailed view. On 29 October 2014 10:19, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > He suggested that I ask you for feedback on the following: > > > > http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html > > Valentin, could you have a look at this? What is your impression when > you compare the above to the URL parsing algorithm from > https://url.spec.whatwg.org/? Thanks! > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:11:37 UTC