RE: PubReq: new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

To my newbie eyes, the other complaints are false, created by the filter rule.
________________________________
From: ext Jérémie Astori<mailto:jeremie@w3.org>
Sent: ý6/ý12/ý2014 1:37 PM
To: Yves Lafon<mailto:ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: Arthur Barstow<mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com>; Hayato Ito<mailto:hayato@google.com>; Ian Jacobs<mailto:ij@w3.org>; webreq@w3.org<mailto:webreq@w3.org>; team-webapps@w3.org<mailto:team-webapps@w3.org>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Xiaoqian Cindy Wu<mailto:xiaoqian@w3.org>
Subject: Re: PubReq: new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

Hi Yves,

On 12/06/14 12:59, Yves Lafon wrote:
>
> The error is a gift for IE6-9 (the decoration of the warning box).
> Do you really want to get rid of it?

Are you suggesting getting rid of IE6? :)

I should have been more clear though. I saw that DXImageTransform was an IE9- fix, but what about the other lines?

>
>>
>> Also, please un-stage the June 19 version.
>
> Great, I was waiting for you to decide on the best pubdate between the two.

The earlier the better ;)

Jérémie

>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jérémie
>>
>> On 12/06/14 09:49, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/12/14 8:19 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Hayato Ito wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've updated the document on github, using the approved text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can see and copy the document from there
>>>>>> http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140619/.
>>>>>> Note that I've also changed the date to 20140619, one week later.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I put it in place,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to both of you!
>>>>
>>>> Yves, if it wouldn't be too much trouble, could you tweak the doc for publication on June 17?
>>>
>>> Sure, done.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:57:33 UTC