- From: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:40:20 -0400
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, team-webapps@w3.org, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Cindy Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
Hi Yves, This document will not be published tomorrow as I don't see this resolved 1 day prior to the publication. Can you re-stage it for next week (either Tuesday or Thursday at your convenience) once this is resolved? Thanks, Jérémie On 11/06/14 09:58, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote: > >> [+Ian] >> >> Ian, >> >> Could you give us a pointer to the decision explaining the approved wording please? > > This thread in April is an attempt to build support for updated pubrules and best practices: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2014AprJun/0001 > > I have not had time to return to that thread but should have time now that we are past the AC meeting. > > Ian > >> >> Meanwhile, Art, I suggest changing the document to include the approved wording. Doing so (and keeping the discussion open) will ensure the document can be published tomorrow. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jérémie >> >> On 10/06/14 14:14, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> It seems to me the essence of the two text blocks is effectively the same. I think it would be helpful, if, for each of the four sentences, you >>> identified the specific part(s) that is not acceptable (and cite the document that shows why WebApps text is not acceptable). Would you please >>> do this? >>> >>> -Thanks, Art >>> >>> On 6/10/14 2:07 PM, Jérémie Astori wrote: >>>> Hi Yves and Art, >>>> >>>> This document cannot be published as is because of the bottom overlay saying: >>>> >>>> This Version of this Document Is Obsolete and Has Been Replaced >>>> This version of the specification is obsolete and has been replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do >>>> not attempt to implement this version of the specification. Do not refer to this version except as a historical artifact. >>>> >>>> For wording, you can use the approved text that can be found on the appmanifest specification [1]: >>>> >>>> THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS! >>>> This specification is for review and not for implementation! For the latest updates, including important bug fixes, please look at the >>>> draft on GitHub instead. >>>> >>>> Let me know if you have any question. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jérémie >>>> >>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-appmanifest-20131217/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/06/14 11:01, Yves Lafon wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jérémie Astori wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> [+Yves, +Xiaoqian] >>>>>> >>>>>> Yves or Xiaoqian, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you install the document in TR please? >>>>> >>>>> Done, >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/06/14 09:35, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>>>>>> WebApps would like to publish a new WD of the (standalone) Shadow DOM spec on June 12: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Thanks, AB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:40:28 UTC