W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2013

List access for Gael Pegliasco

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:02:28 +0000
To: Gaël Pegliasco <gael@pegliasco.com>, "Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org)" <robin@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)" <mjs@apple.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37F242B7DC3@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> I've just been removed from this list.

Since the original message was copied to both public-html-admin@w3.org and  public-html-media@w3.org it would help for Gael to tell what list he thinks he was removed from?

With that data, could Robin or Mike look into this?


PS: Gael:  Mike works in Japan and Robin is in Europe so please be patient if a time zone difference delays their response.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaël Pegliasco [mailto:gael@pegliasco.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54 AM
To: Ronane
Cc: Florian Bösch; Andreas Kuckartz; Sam Ruby; timbl@w3.org; public-html-admin@w3.org; <public-html-media@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

I've just been removed from this list.

I hope this is "accidental" as it would not be very fair-play to automatically unsubscribe people writing objections to EME...

Best regards,


Le 30/05/2013 15:40, Gaël Pegliasco a écrit :
> Le 30/05/2013 11:12, Ronane a écrit :
>> I agree as well.
>> I think that w3c has for now legitimation to develop the standards of 
>> web but it would lose it if it try to add EME into the web.
> I agree with that point.
> This legitimation is acquired because we all agree with W3C Open 
> Standard and accept to follow these rules defined in the most open way.
> But like any other open source project, W3C can be forked if it choose 
> to go on closed way.
> Regards,
> Gaël,

Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:03:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 12 January 2022 09:52:12 UTC