- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:07:59 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, www-archive@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+frO=NGuQMWc=NWK00xy15sUWZczy20Vqo8P0X71Zk0cQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > I understand that this topic has raised passions on all sides. However, > our discussion guidelines say, among other things: > * Tone of messages must be maintained at the highest level of > professionalism; flaming, sarcasm, or personal attacks will not be > tolerated. > * Don't attack a person. Disagree with an idea. > * Respect the right of others to disagree. > * Be polite and show respect. If you have nothing new, positive, > informative or helpful to say, refrain from sharing it. > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/DiscussionGuidelines> > > You usually do a good job engaging politely, so I hope it is clear to you > after thinking about it that this email is over the line. > > In particular, if Rob's signature block seems out of place to you, then > you can ask him privately, or if that fails, ask the Chairs privately to > deal with it. Attacking his personal beliefs on the list is not the right > way to do it and does not maintain the right tone. > > Please try harder to ensure that your future communication on this thread > is up to our expected standards of professionalism and courtesy. > > Thanks, > Maciej (HTML WG Co-Chair) > Thank you for the input. Yes, I was rather undiplomatic in expressing my consternation. Please consider adding guidelines that discourage religious, political, or other off topic content in WG ML discussions, whether in the body of a message or a trailing signature. IMO, its appearance is unprofessional, distracting, and prone to elicit reactions such as mine own. G.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:08:48 UTC