- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:40:58 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Dan Connolly <dckc@madmode.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, www-archive@w3.org
On 01/10/2013 09:22 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-12-27 21:42, Dan Connolly wrote: >> I found the sort of thing I was looking for w.r.t. the decision by the >> WG to go to last call: >> >> Responses to Last Call survey objections >> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:12:40 -0700 >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0347.html >> >> If something like that is available for the way The Director dealt >> with outstanding dissent as of CR, I'd very much like to see it. >> ... > > Indeed. It would be interesting to know how > <http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html#ISSUE-056> > was handled... PLH created the following page on the subject: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/CR This is item 4b in on today's WG telecon agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2013JanMar/0003.html > Best regards, Julian - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 14:41:34 UTC