- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:51:17 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRq-Mp=1gwnteGs2fKuXUz6BDJirqwHDfDwRX0ZK_BGMMA@mail.gmail.com>
That seems to be the best way then. so prov:hasprovenance or prov:has_provenance ? Paul On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Do you mean the element that is generated into the header of the HTML? If > that is the only place it appears, I think we can change that for the > published PR document before handing it over to the webmaster. > > Ivan > > On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:42 , Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > > It's in the <link> element we added last week. > > > > On 26/02/2013 09:40, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> Graham, > >> > >> I am not sure I understand something. > >> > >> I have looked at the prov-o document, and that document does not > mention the prov:hasProvenance term. Ie, where does this term appear in any > of the four Rec-track documents? More importantly, does it appear, if it > does, in a normative section? > >> > >> Ivan > >> > >> > >> On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:30 , Graham Klyne<GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> [I'm keeping this off-list for now, because if Ivan says there's > nothing we can do at this juncture, I see little point in opening the issue > for wider discussion. I am cc'ing www-archive so there's a record of our > discussion.] > >>> > >>> This is a bit embarrassing, given an email I wrote just a couple of > days ago. > >>> > >>> I'm working through comments on PROV-AQ, and Stian has raised the > following: > >>> > >>> [[ > >>> 32) According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-4.2 > >>> > >>> When extension relation types are compared, they MUST be compared as > >>> strings (after converting to URIs if serialised in a different > >>> format, such as a Curie [W3C.CR-curie-20090116]) in a case- > >>> insensitive fashion, character-by-character. Because of this, all- > >>> lowercase URIs SHOULD be used for extension relations. > >>> > >>> Should we not have relation URIs that are all lowercase to avoid > problems? ie. > >>> > >>> Link:<http://acme.example.org/provenance/super-widget>; > >>> rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hasprovenance" > >>> ]] > >>> > >>> I had completely missed this in RFC5988, and had forgotten about > Stian's comment when I replied a couple of days ago. > >>> > >>> If we hadn't just been through the incorporation of provenance links > into the published documents, I'd suggest changing "hasProvenance" to > "has_provenance" to avoid the problems noted. > >>> > >>> So, what now? I see a few options: > >>> > >>> (a) keep the same name, and simply note that, when used as a link > relation, prov:hasProvenance is compared case-insensitively. > >>> (b) if it's not too late, change the property name > >>> (c) define a second property that is all lowercase, and declared > equivalent to the first. > >>> > >>> As far as I can tell, the main consequence of going with option (a) is > that we MUST NOT in future define a different property/relation > prov:hasprovenance, as under some circumstances covered by RFC5988, this > would be indistinguishable from prov:hasProvenance. > >>> > >>> Given where we now are, my inclination would be to stay with things as > they are, but add a note reserving the all lower-case versions of > prov:hasProvenance, etc., from future use because of the case insensitivity > comparison requirement. > >>> > >>> #g > >>> -- > >>> > >> > >> ---- > >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > >> mobile: +31-641044153 > >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Professor Luc Moreau > > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 10:51:46 UTC