RE: URL work in HTML 5

Xmpp is on the "whitelist" of schemes that can be used in registerProtocolHandler, so I predict we'll see a lot more use of xmpp URIs (via web applications) in the near future (once the HTML5 registerProtocolHandler is more widely deployed).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:48 AM
> To: "Martin J. Dürst"
> Cc: Ted Hardie; Larry Masinter; Robin Berjon; Anne van Kesteren; plh@w3.org;
> Pete Resnick (presnick@qualcomm.com); www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: Re: URL work in HTML 5
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 10/15/12 10:25 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > On 2012/10/16 7:06, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >> On 10/15/12 2:00 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Larry
> >>> Masinter<masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>> My understanding of Peter's survey of other specs that make
> >>>> reference to RFC 3987 was that there weren't any whose
> >>>> implementations relied on anything other than the browser to
> >>>> do URL/IRI resolution and processing.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> First, can you provide a pointer to the survey?
> >>
> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012Jul/0060.html

> >>
> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012Jul/0061.html

> >>
> >> It was decidedly informal.
> >
> > Re. the mail just above, what about xmpp: URIs?
> 
> With a few small exceptions, xmpp: URIs are not used natively in XMPP
> itself because the original Jabber team wasn't very savvy about using
> URIs everywhere in the protocol (this was in 1998/1999, whereas we
> didn't define the xmpp: URI scheme until 2005/2006).
> 
> Peter
> 
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/

> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlB9c6YACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxNPQCgklTjdlyxmiXp2JUdFahh5ohi
> og8AmwUBwfdEUB+XQCJKU2ZioabGE6Ac
> =vnGk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 16:05:29 UTC