- From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:46:32 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, www-archive Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote: > > Le 15 oct. 2012 à 10:30, Ted Hardie a écrit : >> There are flocks of URLs/URIs in use outside the web > > (thinking out loud) just to be sure to understand, could you give example of URLs/URIs. I guess maybe things like "mailto:", etc. > As you note, mailto is widely used, as are tel and sip; other schemes, like xmpp, are widely used within their contexts. > >> and there needs to be a very basic agreement of whether the development of common methods for parsing and other handling *across the web and non-web use cases* is a goal or a non-goal. > > It would be interesting to know what kind of issues have for example other softwares (MUA, RDF parser, etc.) be on the Web or not. Maybe the Web is not the right characterization. Maybe it is Internet vs Filesystem. Or maybe it is offline, online or a combination or something else. > > I have a tendency to think also that our highly networked society makes all these things not isolated at all. Everything permeates at a point. > I agree that isolated them so that URIs seen in one context stayed in that context is difficult; it's one of the reasons I believe that there should not be a fork of web-context URIs from non-web-context URIs. regards, Ted Hardie > > > -- > Karl Dubost > Montréal, QC, Canada > http://www.la-grange.net/karl/ >
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 15:47:00 UTC