Re: Chat about your Community Group spec

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:08:29 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 31 Oct 2012, at 3:05 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:19:27 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> I would like to talk to you about the licensing information in your CG  
>>> spec:
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quirks-mode/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>>>
>>> The license information is not consistent with what we ask for here:
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/reports/reqs/
>>
>> This doesn't say that more than one license is prohibited. If that's  
>> what is intended, it would be helpful to state it clearly.
>
> We have a thing in the FAQ about other licenses. The licenses you refer  
> would not be compatible at first glance.

...since CC0 does not require attribution, right?

> My preference would be that you remove the other license(s) and we find  
> time to chat about what you'd like to accomplish, and whether the  
> current licenses get you there.

My plan at this point is to remove the CLA license and move the spec to  
quirks.spec.whatwg.org. I want the spec to be usable in any way without  
requiring attribution.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 00:00:45 UTC