Re: 答复: One Year Anniversary of promise to expedite ISSUE-30

Hi Suzanne,

Thank you for your email. It is very disheartening to know the
negative consequences that the long delay in resolving HTML-ISSUE-30
has caused companies like Pearson and the K-12 community who want to
use longdesc but find it difficult as it not yet reinstated in HTML5.

I apologize. The HTML WG delay is inexcusable. Sam, Paul, and Maciej
will the Chairs now please, please take concrete action to resolve
ISSUE-30? Not doing so will further hurt accessibility.

Best Regards,
Laura

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Taylor, Suzanne
<suzanne.taylor@pearson.com> wrote:
>
> It is really difficult inside a company like Pearson right now. People
> take the pending deprecation as a sign they can't use this at all. K-12 has
> decided to go back to D links, and I don't have a good alternative to tell
> them to use instead. It impacts a massive amount of content… as the
> publishing industry is at a turning point regarding digital/accessibility..
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Can all students and instructors use your product? Make sure: The Pearson
> Guidelines for Accessible Educational Web Media:
> http://wps.pearsoned.com/accessibility
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:43 AM
> To: Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby
> Cc: Laura Carlson; Maciej Stachowiak; Paul Cotton; HTML WG; HTML
> Accessibility Task Force; Sam Ruby; Taylor, Suzanne; www-archive
> Subject: Re: 答复: One Year Anniversary of promise to expedite ISSUE-30
>
>
>
> You know, just leave longdesc in. You have bigger fish to fry and it is
> not like browsers haven't supported it. We are working on a better solution
> in aria-describedat but it is not here yet and longdesc is. If we have a
> better solution in html.next through aria-describedat you could always
> revisit the issue and consider deprecating it then.
>
> To me the overarching issue is that HTML4.01 is a dinosaur and HTML
> deserves a badly needed refresh that is implemented consistently across
> browsers. This will also help pull companies off their older versions of IE
> into next generation browsers. I just got off a call yesterday with a
> customer on the west coast who wanted to use some HTML5 constructs and
> because they needed to support an older browser the accessibility services
> layer would not accommodate them.
>
> just saying ...
>
> Rich
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>
> "Sunyang (Eric)" ---06/28/2012 04:06:20 AM---It seems it is very similar
> with media-description (alt/longdesc) for video discussed in previous me
>
> From: "Sunyang (Eric)" <eric.sun@huawei.com>
> To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby
> <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej
> Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>,
> Cc: Suzanne Taylor <suzanne.taylor@pearson.com>, HTML Accessibility Task
> Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-archive
> <www-archive@w3.org>
> Date: 06/28/2012 04:06 AM
> Subject: 答复: One Year Anniversary of promise to expedite ISSUE-30
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> It seems it is very similar with media-description (alt/longdesc) for
> video discussed in previous meeting, any relationship? Or we just define
> this kind of attribute in image, video and audio?
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2012年6月28日 4:49
> 收件人: Sam Ruby; Paul Cotton; Maciej Stachowiak
> 抄送: Suzanne Taylor; HTML Accessibility Task Force; HTML WG; www-archive
> 主题: Re: One Year Anniversary of promise to expedite ISSUE-30
>
> Hi Sam, Paul, and Maciej,
>
> Can the HTML Chairs please respond to my May 25, 2012 email? [3]
>
> Thank you.
>
> Patiently Waiting,
> Laura
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012May/0140.html
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Laura Carlson
> <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Sam, Paul, and Maciej,
> >
> > Today May 25, 2012, marks the one year anniversary of the HTML WG
> > Chairs' promise [1] to expedite the processing of ISSUE-30 [2] during
> > Last Call.
> >
> > Sam, Paul, and Maciej, as you know ISSUE-30 is still an open issue.
> > What is the timeline for getting ISSUE-30 resolved? Can you please
> > share dates?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Laura
> >
> > [1] Responses to Last Call survey objections:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0347.html
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/30
> >
> > --
> > Laura L. Carlson
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>



--
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 17:15:07 UTC