- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:41:35 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Michael™ Smith <mike@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > The RFCs specify how to parse and resolve. I believe the best way to fill > the gap for browser implementations is to specify the error recovery on top > of these operations, instead of pretending the specs are wrong and rewriting > them. There's no pretense. We went through this before, including giving tests and dozen of examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011Jun/thread.html#msg24 The URL RFCs are wrong and monkeypatching them is not something I'm interested in doing. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 13:42:04 UTC