- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:14:11 +0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
(Cc -www-style +www-archive) (12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote: >> # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are >> # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element according >> # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations. >> >> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ? > > No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help > though. Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond" here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"? -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 08:15:14 UTC