- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:49:40 +0100
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
* Yves Lafon wrote: >Following the publication of the TAG Finding on "Identifying Application >State" [1][2], and to signal the end of REC-track work on that document >after it fulfilled its goal of attracting wider review, the TAG published >a final Working Group Note of 'Usage Patterns For Client-Side URI >parameters' [3]. >Cheers, > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState >[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tag-announce/2011Dec/0000.html >[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-hash-in-uri-20120209/ "The W3C technical report development process is the set of steps and requirements followed by W3C Working Groups to standardize Web technology." That does not seem to say that it is a set of steps and requirements to attract wider review. Technical report... that seems to indicate Technical Reports will contain Technical content. This Technical Report does not. The Note says "If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to www-tag@w3.org (subscribe, archives). All feedback is welcome." but it also says "This document will NOT be updated." So, why would I send comments? If I think what the document says is bad, wrong, misguided, misleading, and whatever argument I may make won't lead to changes to the document, then why bother? Do you really think this makes sense, using a process designed to standardize Web technology to merely attract wider review, to use a Technical Report series to publish non-technical information, to ask for comments on a document while being unwillig to change the document based on those comments? Ignore the implied criticism, I would simply like to understand how and why you think this is a reasonable course of action. Most of the content of the document is boilerplate, that in itself suggest to me that there is something wrong with it. I would like to understand why you (or whoever is responsible) doesn't think and feel like I do. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 23:50:02 UTC