- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:49:37 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- cc: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
>
> Re http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120604#l-615
Site is down.
Why would we want to do this?
> The script is inline in the spec. In the showAlert() function, just after the
> line:
>
> document.body.appendChild(currentAlert);
>
> add:
>
> x.focus();
>
>
> also change:
>
> window.addEventListener('keydown', function (event) {
> if (event.keyCode == 27) {
> if (currentAlert)
> closeAlert2();
> } else {
> closeAlert();
> }
> }, false);
>
> to:
>
> window.addEventListener('keydown', function (event) {
> if (event.keyCode == 27) {
> if (currentAlert)
> closeAlert2();
> }
> }, false);
That would make the dialog not start to fade out when you hit a key. Why
would we want that?
> and remove:
>
> window.addEventListener('scroll', function (event) {
> closeAlert();
> }, false);
That would make the dialog not start to fade out when you scroll, why
would you want that? Having the dialog still up after you've filed a bug
is really annoying when you're trying to read the spec.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 17:50:00 UTC