Re: Fwd: Re: Last Call decision poll

Yes, I will withdraw the formal objections, but mainly on the basis of your 
assurance that, when published, the "This version" link will reflect the 
document version currently linked from the poll.

I note that the "This version" links still do not work.  My preference and 
expectation was that the "This version" link would be available and stabilized 
indefinitely from the start of the consensus call.

I'm seeing strange behaviour with the document for poll question 6:  "Polyglot 
Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents" 
(http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html) 
which sometimes comes up with the old "This version" link.  I'm guessing it's a 
cacheing issue that will eventually sort itself out.

#g
--


Sam Ruby wrote:
> Does this adequately resolve your formal objection?
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Last Call decision poll
> Resent-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:59 +0000
> Resent-From: public-html@w3.org
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:11:25 +0900
> From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
> To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>,        Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> CC: public-html@w3.org
> 
> Roy, Julian,
> 
> To address the problem with responding to the survey that you pointed out,
> I've set up static copies of all the drafts for which the chairs are
> requesting review:
> 
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-LC/
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20110524/
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/md-LC/
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext-LC/
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/WD-html-polyglot-20110524.htm 
> 
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/WD-alt-techniques-20110524.html
> 
> Also, I set up temporary redirects so that the links cited in the survey
> and in the chairs' "Last Call decision poll" message redirect to the
> locations above.
> 
>   --Mike
>

Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 12:43:33 UTC