- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:03:09 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 13:33 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/15/2011 12:48 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > Hi Sam, > > Bijan Parsia has commented on my recent post that > > > > "the current HTMLWG has made these decisions based on consensus is > > pretty easy to show false" > > > > I asked him to elucidate and he did > > http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/06/html5-accessibility-chops-conflicting-advice-and-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-14653 > > > > I can understand if you are not interested in commenting on this, but > > would be interested to hear your thoughts > > We have forks over items over which there was no objections: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0000.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0132.html You don't seem to be replying (in a clear way at least) to Bijan's point. The point being that evidently there isn't consensus but the lack of consensus doesn't manifest through W3C procedures. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:03:51 UTC