- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:28:49 +0200
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Michaelâ„¢ Smith <mike@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:22:34 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 12:13 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> I was asked to set up a repository of Web DOM Core on w3.org space. >> Would >> it be possible to put a clone of >> http://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/web-dom-core >> on http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore (web-dom-core is fine too)? It would be >> nice if the stuff we checked in would also be checked out somewhere so >> the >> drafts can be easily viewed. > > why not using > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/domcore instead? Because then it will be part of the webapps repository rather than be its own repository. That will also screw up syncing with the repositories elsewhere. >> and from a DVCS standpoint it makes sense that this remains a >> self-contained entity, much like the IndexedDB draft that is already >> hosted separately.) > > It seems a bug to me to have IndexedDB separate. It's not going to be > scalable if we created a new repository for each specification... Why would that not scale? We do not have that many specifications and they all fit within the same directory on TR/ too. That will also avoid having to merge each time for specifications you never touch, etc. Alternatively we could just keep the editor's draft local and push out a copy or so every now and then to w3.org space, but that seems less nice. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 13:29:29 UTC