- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > While I agree that it is helpful for us to cooperate, I should point > > out that the WHATWG was never formally approached by the W3C about > > this > > With whom (and where?) would such a "formal" discussion take place? > > I would prefer that such a discussion happen on a publicly archived > mailing list. I meant a discussion about a general approach to how we can resolve differences, not a discussion of a specific issue, by the way. Out of interest, with whom and where would a formal discussion of the reverse take place? e.g. if the WHATWG wanted to request a change in the W3C HTML WG spec? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 26 June 2010 02:57:43 UTC