W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006260255260.22642@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> >
> > While I agree that it is helpful for us to cooperate, I should point 
> > out that the WHATWG was never formally approached by the W3C about 
> > this
> 
> With whom (and where?) would such a "formal" discussion take place?
> 
> I would prefer that such a discussion happen on a publicly archived 
> mailing list.

I meant a discussion about a general approach to how we can resolve 
differences, not a discussion of a specific issue, by the way.

Out of interest, with whom and where would a formal discussion of the 
reverse take place? e.g. if the WHATWG wanted to request a change in the 
W3C HTML WG spec?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 26 June 2010 02:57:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:50 UTC