W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Developer and Public Editions Re: Differences between the W3C and WHATWG specifications

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:13:08 -0400
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jacobs B. Ian" <ij@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7FE0A6A1-5BA1-4597-A598-0CF471E03ACF@la-grange.net>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>

Le 18 juin 2010 à 06:03, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> If you don't play with the latest why would you be interested in specifications that are still in development? And why the assumption that the snapshot would reflect reality more than the latest draft? Often changes to the latest draft are made based on finding out that implementations implemented something different from the snapshot.

what would you recommend to solve the needs for the two communities?

* Some people who want a JIT snapshot.
* Some people who want a slow moving version for reading, translating, working and trying.
* Some people who need a stable milestone

Open to hear.
On my side I will ask people at work.

Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 10:15:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:50 UTC