- From: Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:13:32 -0700
- To: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinDAHGLD5W4DEPQuAeD_1vGj8=UgT7CLPNWPV5w@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the quick reply: please find attached the XQuery Update and XQueryX Update test suite results for Zorba 1.4.0 based on the XQUTS_1_0_1.zip as of July 27, 2010. Thanks for the help, Sorin On 7/28/10, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Yes, this is a known issue. We removed some redundant test cases in XQUTS > 1.0.1. We would appreciate your results for XQUTS 1.0.1. We will no longer > be updating results for XQUTS 1.0.0. > > -- Andrew > > -------------------- > Andrew Eisenberg > IBM > 5 Technology Park Drive > Westford, MA 01886 > > andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com > Phone: 978-399-5158 > > > > > > From: > Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com> > To: > Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: > zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch> > Date: > 07/28/2010 12:02 PM > Subject: > Minimal conformance in the new XQUTS_1_0_1 > > > > Hi Andrew, > > the XQuery Update and XQueryX Update using Zorba 1.4.0 based on the > XQUTS 1.0.1 as of July 27, 2010. > > We have noticed that compared to the previous version (XQUTS 1.0.0 as > of Aug. 13, 2009) the number of tests required for minimal conformance > changed: > - in XQUTS 1.0.0 there were 725 tests > - in XQUTS 1.0.1 there are 667 tests > > Is this a known issue? > > If so would it be OK if we submit the results based on XQUTS 1.0.1 as > well? > > Thanks for the help, > Sorin > > >
Attachments
- application/zip attachment: Zorba1.4.0_XQuery_X__update_1_0_1_result.zip
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 07:57:36 UTC