Re: [Zorba-coders] Re: Minimal conformance in the new XQUTS_1_0_1

Guys,

I thought we were doing 100.

Sorin

Could you please investigate what's going on ?

Thanks
Dana

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 28, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com 
 > wrote:

>
> Thanks. I've started a new report for XQUTS 1.0.1. Zorba is all  
> alone for the moment, showing 97.6% for Minimal conformance.
>
>                                        -- Andrew
>
> --------------------
> Andrew Eisenberg
> IBM
> 5 Technology Park Drive
> Westford, MA  01886
>
> andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 978-399-5158
>
>
>
>
> From:	Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com>
> To:	Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc:	www-archive@w3.org, zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch>
> Date:	07/28/2010 05:13 PM
> Subject: 	Re: Minimal conformance in the new XQUTS_1_0_1
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply: please find attached the XQuery Update and
> XQueryX Update test suite results for Zorba 1.4.0 based on the
> XQUTS_1_0_1.zip as of July 27, 2010.
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Sorin
>
> On 7/28/10, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Yes, this is a known issue. We removed some redundant test cases  
> in XQUTS
> > 1.0.1. We would appreciate your results for XQUTS 1.0.1. We will  
> no longer
> > be updating results for XQUTS 1.0.0.
> >
> >                                                 -- Andrew
> >
> > --------------------
> > Andrew Eisenberg
> > IBM
> > 5 Technology Park Drive
> > Westford, MA  01886
> >
> > andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
> > Phone: 978-399-5158
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com>
> > To:
> > Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc:
> > zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch>
> > Date:
> > 07/28/2010 12:02 PM
> > Subject:
> > Minimal conformance in the new XQUTS_1_0_1
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > the XQuery Update and XQueryX Update using Zorba 1.4.0 based on the
> > XQUTS 1.0.1 as of July 27, 2010.
> >
> > We have noticed that compared to the previous version (XQUTS 1.0.0  
> as
> > of Aug. 13, 2009) the number of tests required for minimal  
> conformance
> > changed:
> > - in XQUTS 1.0.0 there were 725 tests
> > - in XQUTS 1.0.1 there are 667 tests
> >
> > Is this a known issue?
> >
> > If so would it be OK if we submit the results based on XQUTS 1.0.1  
> as
> > well?
> >
> > Thanks for the help,
> > Sorin
> >
> >
> >
> [attachment "Zorba1.4.0_XQuery(X)_update_1_0_1_result.zip" deleted  
> by Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zorba-coders mailing list
> Zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/zorba-coders