[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-101: Spec reference for US-ASCII - Straw Poll for Objections'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'ISSUE-101: Spec
reference for US-ASCII - Straw Poll for Objections' (HTML Working Group)
for Julian Reschke.



---------------------------------
Objections to the Change Proposal to change ASCII reference to point to
ISO standard
----
We have a Change Proposal to change the spec's ASCII reference to point to
ISO standard. If you have strong objections to adopting this Change
Proposal, please state your objections below.  Keep in mind, you must
actually state an objection, not merely cite someone else. If you feel that
your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else, then
it is not necessary to repeat it.
Objections: 





---------------------------------
Objections to the Change Proposal to make no change and retain a link to a
free of charge reference for ASCII
----
We have a Change Proposal to make no change and retain a link to a free of
charge reference for ASCII. If you have strong objections to adopting this
Change Proposal, please state your objections below.  Keep in mind, you
must actually state an objection, not merely cite someone else. If you feel
that your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else,
then it is not necessary to repeat it.
Objections: 
This change proposal does not address the original problem, being that RFC
1345 is not a usable reference for US-ASCII, as confirmed by Martin Dürst,
the IETF Character Set Reviewer (linked from the original change proposal,
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0084.html).





---------------------------------
Objections to the Change Proposal to replace HTML5's current ASCII
reference with a link to ECMA-6's homepage
----
We have a Change Proposal to replace HTML5's current ASCII reference with
a link to ECMA-6's homepage. If you have strong objections to adopting this
Change Proposal, please state your objections below.  Keep in mind, you
must actually state an objection, not merely cite someone else. If you feel
that your objection has already been adequately addressed by someone else,
then it is not necessary to repeat it.
Objections: 



These answers were last modified on 28 July 2010 at 08:54:54 U.T.C.
by Julian Reschke

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-101-objection-poll/ until
2010-07-30.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 08:55:02 UTC