RE: HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items

> Is there a specific reason this item is not going to a survey?

Maciej and I discussed the open issues while preparing the agenda and we did not discuss this issue.

> Is your agenda item implying that you're issuing a second call for revision?

Yes.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Shelley Powers [mailto:shelleyp@burningbird.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:16 AM
To: Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby; Maciej Stachowiak
Cc: www-archive
Subject: HTML WG telecon 2010-07-08 specific items

I read through the agenda items for the HTML WG's next teleconference 
[1] and had a couple of questions:

I notice that Issue 89 is not on the agenda. 
Is there some reason for a delay on 
this item?

In addition, I noticed the following:

> 4. Issues needing revised proposals
> Note: The Chairs will be requesting revised proposals for the 
> following issues.
>
> a) Issue-31 missing-alt
> b) Issue-56 urls-webarch
> c) Issue-80 title-alternative
> d) Issue-85 anchor-roles
> e) Issue-100 srcdoc
I believe that you all issued a request for a revised proposals for 
several of these issues, including Issue 100. And that a deadline of 
June 30th was given for these updates. Is your agenda item implying that 
you're issuing a second call for revision? Or that the time has come, 
and gone, in order to make these revisions, and unrevised proposals are 
being dropped?

Thank you

Shelley Powers

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 01:14:41 UTC