- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:09:44 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, www-archive Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > If that's what the telecon is for, then that's what it should be described > as, not as a "weekly working group teleconference". I wouldn't have any > objection to the chairs conducting a "weekly status report", if it was > clearly positioned as such. Currently, however, it is positioned the same > way as telecons in other WGs, and as such is going to give the impression > that the meeting is expected to have decisions. > ... No, it's clearly not positioned that way -- everytime this topic comes up it is clarified that decisions aren't made during the telco. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 11:10:24 UTC