- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:28:39 +0000
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, timbl@w3.org, public-cdf@w3.org, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, process-issues@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4B1EEC9C-CF79-4B43-B799-D38C72C34707@btinternet.com>
Ian, What action has been taken in the past 26 months to commission an external review? Have any appropriate metrics been considered, developed or agreed? regards Jonathan Chetwynd http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Jul/0034.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Oct/0024.html On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 22:20 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > Ian, > > > I am concerned because it is apparent that while W3C may successfully > be meeting the needs of its members, it is less clear that it is > meeting it's published objectives. > > > If W3C is not to be accountable to any group other than its members, > could this be stated more clearly in its objectives, which currently > appear to offer a far wider responsibility with more ambitious goals? > > > You had written to me suggesting that an external review was being > discussed at that time. It was discussed but we discuss so many things that it is difficult to do all of them. I still think it's a good idea. _Ian > regards > > > > my logo > Jonathan Chetwynd > > j.chetwynd@btinternet.com > http://www.openicon.org/ > > +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 > > > > > On 17 Jul 2008, at 21:39, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 21:22 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >>> Ian >>> >>> >>> What action has been taken in the past nine months to commission an >>> external review? >> >> None, to my knowledge. >> >> _ Ian >> >>> >>> regards >>> >>> >>> my logo >>> Jonathan Chetwynd >>> >>> j.chetwynd@btinternet.com >>> http://www.openicon.org/ >>> >>> +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Full Potential: Who's counting? >>> >>> >>> Ian, >>> >>> >>> Who is tasked with measuring and reporting on how or indeed whether >>> W3C is fulfilling it's stated objective? >>> >>> >>> Is this an external and independent body? >>> >>> >>> Where are their reports published? >>> >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Jonathan Chetwynd >>> Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html >>> The first phase of the Web is human communication though shared >>> knowledge. >>> >>> >>> The Consortium exists as a place for those companies for whom the >>> Web >>> is essential to meet and agree on the common underpinnings that will >>> allow everyone to go forward. >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/ >>> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) develops interoperable >>> technologies (specifications, guidelines, software, and tools) to >>> lead >>> the Web to its full potential. >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/org.html#public >>> W3C Members include vendors of technology products and services, >>> content providers, corporate users, research laboratories, standards >>> bodies, and governments, all of whom work to reach consensus on a >>> direction for the Web. >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Points/ >>> W3C's mission is to lead the Web to its full potential, which it >>> does >>> by developing technologies (specifications, guidelines, software, >>> and >>> tools) that will create a forum for information, commerce, >>> inspiration, independent thought, and collective understanding. >>> >>> >>> Today this universe benefits society by enabling new forms of human >>> communication and opportunities to share knowledge. One of W3C's >>> primary goals is to make these benefits available to all people, >>> whatever their hardware, software, network infrastructure, native >>> language, culture, geographical location, or physical or mental >>> ability. >>> >>> >> -- >> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >> Tel: +1 718 260-9447 >> >> > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Sunday, 3 January 2010 15:28:59 UTC