- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:32:54 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: RDFa WG Team/Chairs <team-rdfa-chairs-wg@w3.org>, Philippe le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, W3C Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 02/26/2010 05:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> Can I start telling people that RDFa is planned to be released as a part >> of HTML5? > > For all our Working Drafts, there is no firm guarantee it will proceed > to REC. The Working Group could decide to abandon the deliverable > instead of taking it to Last Call. This is true even for the HTML5 draft > itself. But it would be fair to say that we are currently treating > HTML+RDFa as a REC-track deliverable. Philippe, Maciej, Thanks for the response, both of you have clarified what I had suspected: * HTML WG is treating HTML+RDFa as a REC-track deliverable. * HTML WG makes no firm guarantees on any draft proceeding to REC, including the main HTML5 spec itself. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 22:33:27 UTC