- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:56:22 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG Team/Chairs <team-rdfa-chairs-wg@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, W3C Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:15 -0500, Manu Sporny wrote: > When we were publishing HTML+RDFa as a FPWD, and then again in the most > recent draft, it was repeated several times that (paraphrasing): "Just > because the HTML WG is publishing HTML+RDFa now does not mean that we > intend to commit to publishing it as a REC". Unless I'm mistaken, it remains true. And this is also true for the main HTML5 specification as well. > Has HTML WG, with the recent charter update, committed to HTML+RDFa as a > WG deliverable? This text seems to imply that it has: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#deliverables Correct. I wanted to list the existence documents being worked on in the Working Group. > Can I start telling people that RDFa is planned to be released as a part > of HTML5? Yes, as it is true as well for Canvas and Microdata. It is not part of the HTML5 specification itself, but it is part of the HTML5 extensions. Philippe
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 21:56:30 UTC