- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:55 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Shelley Powers <shelleypowers@burningbird.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, ext Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Hi, Folks- Sam Ruby wrote (on 2/14/10 4:05 PM): > Shelley Powers wrote: > >> I no longer know how to participate in the group. I cannot participate >> in the group if the co-chairs continue in their uneven stewardship of >> the group. > > So, for now, I would like to reserve public-html for discussions of the > form of "hey Charles (or Ian): can you update your change proposal to > include 'x'" or "hey Chairs: I'm not happy with either change proposal, > and I would like to produce a third one, can I have n days in order to > prepare it?" > > Other discussions can (and should) proceed. Just elsewhere, with results > brought back to the larger group. As a subscriber to www-archive, and as someone interested in allowing people their say in the HTML process (even if they don't want to join the WG to do so), isn't there a list that would be more appropriate to such discussions? Shelley and Tab want to debate something about HTML... that seems in scope for *some* HTML WG list, if not public-html. Why not use public-html-comments rather than www-archive? That seems more respectful to people participating in the HTML WG discussions, and to people who would rather not have HTML WG-specific arguments spill over into www-archive. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:37:04 UTC