- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:55:51 -0500
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Larry Masinter wrote: > I know the working group decided that two years ago! > > However, Working Groups do not have the authority to change > their charter. The charter is established by the director > after discussion by the AC. The AC discussion explicitly > removed 2D graphics from the charter, if you look at the > record, there was an earlier draft of the charter with > 2D graphics that was explicitly removed. > > So, it's fine. I'm not bringing this up in the working > group because the working group decision was clear. > > I think it would be fine to update the charter to include > 2D Context as actually within scope if that's what the > working group proposes and the Director and AC agree. That, too, was discussed. See issue 38: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/38?changelog > I wouldn't object to that. > > But the W3C AC actually discusses charters, comes to > agreement about scope, and the discussions about charter > scope are intense, careful, and the wordings chosen > carefully. Companies decide whether or not to join a > working group and who to send as representatives based > on what the charter says. > > So my point stands: whether or not the working group > decided to include this material, it is out of scope > for the current charter. The current state, as I understand it, is that the WG has concurrence by the Director for over two years to include Immediate Mode Graphics and canvas element. > Larry > -- > http://larry.masinter.net - Sam Ruby > -----Original Message----- > From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:29 AM > To: Larry Masinter; Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org); Philippe Le Hegaret > Cc: www-archive; Maciej Stachowiak; Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby; Manu Sporny > Subject: Re: Documents not in scope for HTML-WG > > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:16:43 +0100, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> > wrote: >> None of RDFa, Microdata or 2D Context, are in scope for the current >> HTML working group charter. > > Well, at least for 2D Context the Working Group decided over two years ago > that it is: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 > >
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 17:56:26 UTC