RE: Letter to the Team Contact - ISSUE-30.

Paul Cotton, Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:30:50 +0000:
>> The Decision namely states that there are two ways to appeal it, and 
>> I believed that it was very clear from my letter
>> which option I chose.
  ---
> I believe Leif is appealing the Chairs' decision as per:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGAppeals
> 
> 3.5 Appeal of a Chair's Decision
  ....
> When group participants believe that their concerns are not being 
> duly considered by the group, they MAY ask the 
> 
Director<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#def-Director> 
> (for representatives of a Member organization, via their Advisory 
> Committee representative) to confirm or deny the decision. The 
> participants SHOULD also make their requests known to the Team 
> 
Contact<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups.html#TeamContact>. 
> The Team Contact MUST inform the Director when a group participant 
> has raised concerns about due process.
> 
> Any requests to the Director to confirm a decision MUST include a 
> summary of the issue (whether technical or procedural), decision, and 
> rationale for the objection. All counter-arguments, rationales, and 
> decisions MUST be recorded.
> 
> Since Leif is an Invited Expert in the HTML WG he is entitled to send 
> this appeal to the Director via the Team Contact.
> 
> /paulc

Hi. Thanks! Yes, I suppose that this must be what the Decision document 
meant. So, if I understand, once the Team Contact has contated the 
Director, I can except the Director to confirm or deny the Decision 
based on the concerns I have raised.
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 15:52:39 UTC