- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:11:54 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org> wrote: > VCard ontology RDF is here [1] > > Also, re blank node solution - I thought it was blank node solution > PLUS the "short-cut" properties, as to provide backwards compatibility > and easy use wit vCard 2006, so we don't *force* people to use blank > nodes unless they need them. Correct? Note that there are some in the Linked Data scene who believe bNodes to be obsolete / old fashioned / annoying, and claim that modern RDF shouldn't use them. cheers, Dan > [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 06:12:34 UTC