- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:51:13 +0100
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>
On 14 Sep 2009, at 04:58, Renato Iannella wrote: > Please comment on the changes so far - I hope they capture the > ideas so far, but I may have misread some...so please have a good > read thru.... The RDF/XML syntax in 3.2 is indeed wrong. Firstly, rdf:Lists don't use <rdf:li> (only rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq and rdf:Alt do). Secondly, rdf:parseType="Collection" doesn't work with literal values. I'm not sure why any kind of grouping structure is needed here - it unnecessarily complicates matters for both consumers and producers of data. Why not just this? <VCard> <title>Principal Scientist</title> <title>Visiting Professor</title> </VCard> Section 3.5. I'd suggest ditching the idea of inline base64 data as literals and instead using "data:" URIs. > I also could not find any nice RDF/OWL to HTML converter (yet) ;-) Tried this? http://planb.nicecupoftea.org/2009/06/06/generating-specs- from-rdfs-owl-docs/ -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 05:51:44 UTC