- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:36:35 +1000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:01, Toby Inkster wrote: > It's certainly suboptimal, but seems to gel with how vCard-in-RDF is > used in the wild. Perhaps we should steer producers of data in one > direction, while noting to consumers that historically some people > have > used the property differently. So, what do you both recommend I do to the current draft? > So for the example at hand: > > :Work rdfs:subClassOf [ > owl:unionOf (:Address :Label :Tel) > ] . Is this OK Martin to meet your concern? Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA
Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 06:42:53 UTC