- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:30:07 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: www-archive@w3.org
Hi, fantasai- fantasai wrote (on 11/25/09 5:05 PM): > > Right, so like I said > >> > Maybe you're complaining about things like >> > <code><pre>...</pre></code> >> > not working? That would be because the markup is invalid. > > It's still invalid. > > Maybe this will get this point across: Oops. I misparsed what you had said there. I often screw that up, the content model for <code> and <pre> seem a bit arbitrary to me. Fixed now. > For defining instance of term, I prefer a convention that uses > <dt><dfn>term</dfn></dt> > instead of > <dt>term</dt> > as I sometimes use the latter for things that shouldn't get marked up in > the index as defining instances of a term. > > Note HTML5's explanation here: > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-dt-element > > specifically > "The dt element itself, when used in a dl element, does not indicate > that its contents > are a term being defined, but this can be indicated using the dfn element." Huh, I'd never made that distinction before. I only use <dt> for glossaries, but I'll start using <dfn> as well, now. Fixed. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 06:30:33 UTC