- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:46:47 +0900
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:04:09 +0900, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Is the set of people who are willing and able to create svg in > notepad/emacs/vi/whatever *and* are sufficiently bothered by the need to > add an additional 34 characters (including the space) as a talisman that > it is worth paving this particular cowpath? > > As someone who does routinely author svg using vi and is very much > concerned with optimizing the sizes of such files, I must say that *I'm* > skeptical. It's just that since we already plan on changing HTML parsers to support SVG it seems worthwhile to investigate adding this as the cost seems small. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 01:48:04 UTC