- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:32:23 +0000
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: process-issues@w3.org, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, www-archive@w3.org
On 25 Feb 2009, at 15:32, Ian Jacobs wrote: > On 25 Feb 2009, at 6:57 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I think it could improve both the perceived and actual >> transparency and accountability of the W3C as a whole to have what >> I've tentatively called an "Audit Board". An Audit Board would be >> charged with investigating specific incidents and situations and >> producing a report and making recommendations. > > Bijan, > > Can you provide more information about the situation(s) that led to > this proposal? Feel free to contact me offlist. The immediate impetus was this email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0119.html I first aired the idea in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0120.html I don't know it has to be an AB per se...perhaps we have too many groups :) I just find myself doing list forensics a bunch these days and wish that the body of knowledge of dysfunction and how to deal with it were systematized in a best practices document (with supporting cases). Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 16:28:54 UTC