- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:05:52 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, www-archive@w3.org
On 25/2/09 15:15, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 25 Feb 2009, at 13:55, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Karl Dubost wrote: >>> Hi Bijan, >>> Le 25 févr. 2009 à 08:02, Bijan Parsia a écrit : >>>> It doesn't seem to me that the W3C has an Audit Board which tries to >>>> analyze failures and draw lessons from them. That could be a very >>>> helpful thing. >>> Disclaimer: I have been working at W3C, as an employee, from 2000 to >>> 2008. >>> The W3C doesn't have an audit board, because it has its full >>> community: The public, the members and the staff. > > Er...I don't see how that's remotely a replacement. An Audit Board would > be charged with investigating specific incidents and situations and > producing a report and making recommendations. Presumably, that would > involve the full community. I don't think not having any such process is > a good thing because, for example, it leads to hodgepodge accountibility > and little investigation. Can you suggest a similar organization that does have such a board? or the most relevantly similar that you're aware of? delurkingly, Dan
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 16:06:48 UTC