- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:47:42 +0000
- To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
-: All to/cc, +: www-archive On 17 Feb 2009, at 23:07, Mark Davis wrote: > I put together a short FAQ on NFC, including some figures on > performance and > frequencies. > > http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/nfc-faq Under "Parsing tokens is very performance-sensitive; won't normalizing be too costly?" you talk of < U+0300 being unaffected, before talking in the included strategy of > U+00FF — is this a mistake, or why is this inconsistency here? -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 19:48:21 UTC