- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:45:55 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
+www-archive Sam Ruby wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> Dailey, David P. wrote: >>> [...] >> I encourage you to reply publicly. I assure you that neither your >> comments, nor anyone else's, will be ignored. > > +1 > > I agree that this working group has created the perception that David > describes, and I am actively working to correct that. But the way to do > that is with specifics. Raise issues no the list. If they are ignored, > let me know that (and point to the message). If Lachlan is right and > they are not ignored, then this won't be an issue. For any serious technical issue raised, I will definitely respond eventually, even if it takes a few weeks, depending on my schedule. I won't guarantee every individual mail gets a response, but I will at least cover all points raised in a thread. I will basically do it the way I've handled Selectors API feedback in the WebApps WG. I should also point out that you can also use bugzilla. Just use the "HTML WG" product and "Developer's Guide" component. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=Developer%27s%20Guide > For me to take an issue seriously, however, it would be helpful if you > can convince a minimum of two other independent people that your idea > has merit. Personally, I think the number of people supporting a particular idea is irrelevant and I generally will not be taking that into account. If one person raises a technical issue and can back it up with good arguments, which are stronger than any arguments against, even if no-one else explicitly expresses support, then I will accept it and move on. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 13:46:35 UTC