Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference


Sam Ruby wrote:
> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> Dailey, David P. wrote:
>>> [...]
>> I encourage you to reply publicly.  I assure you that neither your 
>> comments, nor anyone else's, will be ignored.
> +1
> I agree that this working group has created the perception that David 
> describes, and I am actively working to correct that.  But the way to do 
> that is with specifics.  Raise issues no the list.  If they are ignored, 
> let me know that (and point to the message).  If Lachlan is right and 
> they are not ignored, then this won't be an issue.

For any serious technical issue raised, I will definitely respond 
eventually, even if it takes a few weeks, depending on my schedule.  I 
won't guarantee every individual mail gets a response, but I will at 
least cover all points raised in a thread.  I will  basically do it the 
way I've handled Selectors API feedback in the WebApps WG.

I should also point out that you can also use bugzilla.  Just use the 
"HTML WG" product and "Developer's Guide" component.

> For me to take an issue seriously, however, it would be helpful if you 
> can convince a minimum of two other independent people that your idea 
> has merit.

Personally, I think the number of people supporting a particular idea is 
irrelevant and I generally will not be taking that into account.  If one 
person raises a technical issue and can back it up with good arguments, 
which are stronger than any arguments against, even if no-one else 
explicitly expresses support, then I will accept it and move on.

Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software

Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 13:46:35 UTC