- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:37:08 +1000
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- CC: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>, Andreas Radinger <andreas.radinger@unibw.de>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Hi Peter - I understand the issue - perhaps we should try to fix the source (vCard 4.0 currently under development?) What do others think? Renato On 1 Dec 2009, at 20:53, Peter Mika wrote: > Hi Renato, > > Many thanks for this otherwise ungrateful work... > > Here is a small suggestion to maximize compatibility with hCard. The > hCard spec says that organizations and persons are distinguished there > using the following rule: > > "If the "FN" and "ORG" properties have the exact same value (typically > because they are set on the same element, e.g. class="fn org"), then the > hCard represents contact information for a company, organization or > place and SHOULD be treated as such. In this case the author also MUST > NOT set the "N" property, or set it (and any sub-properties) explicitly > to the empty string "". Thus parsers SHOULD handle the missing "N" > property, in this case by implying empty values for all the "N" > sub-properties. " See http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard > > Even if we don't formalize this constraint (AFAIK can not be done in > OWL), at least we should explain that it helps to maximize compatibility > if in the organization markup the value of fn and the value of > organization-name is the same. We should also adapt the example > accordingly, currently the vcard:fn is Example.Com, while the > vcard:organization-name is Example.Com LLC . > > Thanks, > Peter > > > > Renato Iannella wrote: >> Ok guys - hopefully this is *really* it....please review: >> >> http://spin.nicta.org.au/vCardRDF/vcard-rdf-20091201.html >> http://spin.nicta.org.au/vCardRDF/ns2009-final.rdf >> >> I've updated the Examples in Section 4 and 5 (rdfa new).... >> >> Comments/Feedback.... >> >> Cheers... Renato Iannella >> NICTA >> >> > Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 13:40:59 UTC