- From: Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:37:44 +0100
- To: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
- Cc: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, ietf-honest@lists.iadl.org, www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:04:06PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > W3 consortium address removed. W3 consortium address added. > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Noah Slater wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:51:02PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > > > The answer is yes. You did consent to receive communications on IETF > > > business from other IETF participants. > > > > False. > > > > I consented to receiving mail from a specific mailing list. > > Your dispute over the facts is frivolous. Well then, I am sorry that I am filling you your inbox with frivolity. Oh wait… > > > I am faciliitating that communication. > > > > You are facilitating the aggressive and unwelcome advancement of your personal > > agenda by subscribing what probably amounts to hundreds of people to a mailing > > list without their prior permission. > > They have consented to communication on IETF business. No they haven't. Why do you persist with this absurd line of reasoning? > This list isn't about any advancement of MY personal agenda. It certainly seems like that is the case. > Rather, your messages now are YOUR personal agenda. Of course they are. The major difference being that I didn't subscribe you to a mailing list without your proper consent, where I can moan about lots of random things that are of no interest to you. I am complaining about this list, on this list. I think that is wholly appropriate. > I've asked you to stop it nicely since your baseless claims against me have > nothing to do with IETF business. I warmly invite you to unsubscribe me. > Julian Reschke has not been resubscribed to any list after he has > unsubscribed. His characterization of the facts is false. He has used > different email addresses: > > Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, > Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, > > Quite plainly, there is no way to tell different email addresses aren't > different people. This should have been a clue that you were doing something wrong. > Also quite plainly, these people have no compunctions about abusing the W3 > consortium mailsystems for unauthorized purposes. Sort of ironic they should > complain about abuse... If the W3C has a problem with me using this list, that is my business. > > > > I don't care about IETF business. > > > > > > Then why did you post to the IETF list? > > > > To make some technical comments on an Internet Draft. > > That's called IETF business. So because I care about a subset of IETF business, I have to care about it all? > > You have a very strange view of how social interaction works. I have made it > > abundantly clear that your communication with me is unwelcome, and so have a > > number of other people. Telling me that you will continue because you're not > > breaking any rules just means that you're behaving like an arse. > > Then you can peacefully unsubscribe. Most people don't unsubscribe. I recognise this argument! It is included at the bottom of most spams I receive. > > I would apologise for replying to your private mail publicly, but ah well... > > I see you are still subscribed. Of course, if you didn't want that, you > know how to unsubscribe. If you persist in off-topic tirades, or are > really unable to follow mailman instructions, I will help you with how > to use mailman. So the way to stop receiving emails from this list is to complain about it loudly and in public? Well then, I wholeheartedly encourage all the other list recipients to similarly speak up and get yourself unsubscribed! Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 20:38:30 UTC