- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of cam@mcc.id.au <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:32:01 +0000
- To: www-archive@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings?' (HTML Working Group) for Cameron McCormack. --------------------------------- Publish draft without warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., without the additional warnings, also a.k.a. Ian's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? * (x) Yes * ( ) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Given that the only difference between the two drafts is a small amount of informative text, I don't mind which draft is published. --------------------------------- Publish draft with warnings? ---- Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., with additional warnings, also a.k.a. Manu's draft) as a Working Draft at this time? In order to provide more useful feedback regarding which warning text should not be considered controversial and thus, should be removed, please follow the suggestions outlined in this email. * (x) Yes * ( ) No Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): If Manu's draft is published, I would like it to be published only after the split-out spec sections (e.g. Databases) are removed. I have no opinion on whether certain warnings should be removed or reworded, without having looked into it in detail. --------------------------------- What to publish? ---- Given that these documents differ only in the presence or absence of warnings, how would you like the results of the poll to be interpreted? * ( ) I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts. * (x) I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): While I am happy for the WG to publish multiple documents, I don't think selecting between drafts to publish as the main HTML 5 spec at a given point in time is the best way to proceed. I wonder if David Hyatt should really be listed as editor on whichever documents end up being published, though, given that he has not edited either. These answers were last modified on 11 August 2009 at 23:28:33 U.T.C. by Cameron McCormack Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ until 2009-08-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:32:11 UTC